FireStream 9270 vs Quadro T1000

When comparing FireStream 9270 and Quadro T1000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro T1000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FireStream 9270

Quadro T1000

Main Specs

	FireStream 9270	Quadro T1000
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs

FireStream 9270 has 220% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 645 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 4400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	5−6	35−40
ultra / 1080p	2−3	21−24
QHD / 1440p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	14−16	60−65
medium / 1080p	7−8	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	55−60
ultra / 1080p	8−9	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	10−12	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	130−140	250−260
medium / 768p	100−110	220−230
ultra / 1080p	50−55	180−190
QHD / 1440p	27−30	110−120
4K / 2160p	12−14	70−75
high / 768p	75−80	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	110−120
ultra / 1080p	30−35	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	45−50
ultra / 1080p	5−6	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	5−6	14−16
low / 720p	16−18	80−85
medium / 1080p	8−9	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	55−60	180−190
medium / 1080p	18−20	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 328% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	8−9	24−27
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	12−14	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	10−12	70−75
ultra / 1080p	5−6	30−35
QHD / 1440p	−	21−24
medium / 720p	45−50	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	3−4	24−27
ultra / 1080p	1−2	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	10−11	65−70
medium / 1080p	5−6	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	90−95	130−140
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	100−110
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	10−11	65−70
medium / 1080p	9−10	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	21−24	130−140
medium / 768p	14−16	85−90
high / 1080p	6−7	45−50
ultra / 1080p	4−5	24−27
4K / 2160p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
high / 768p	30−35	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than FireStream 9270.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9270	Quadro T1000
Architecture	TeraScale	Turing
Code name	RV770	TU117
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 November 2008	27 May 2019
Pipelines	800
Core clock speed	750 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost Clock		1455 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	12 nm
Texture fill rate	30.00
Floating-point performance	1,200.0 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1
Vulkan	N/A

FireStream 9270 vs Quadro T1000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares