GeForce 920MX vs Quadro T1000
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 920MX and Quadro T1000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 920MX and Quadro T1000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro T1000
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920MX | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 212% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 430 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6200 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 180% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro T1000. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 680% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce 920MX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920MX | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
Code name | N16V-GMR | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 March 2015 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 256 | |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 | |
Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |