GeForce 940MX vs Quadro T1000
When comparing GeForce 940MX and Quadro T1000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 940MX and Quadro T1000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro T1000
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce 940MX | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 117% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 940MX is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 273 MHz higher, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 4000 MHz higher, than GeForce 940MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 264% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce 940MX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 940MX | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
Code name | N16S-GTR-B/S | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 10 March 2016 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 | |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |