GeForce GT 730M vs Quadro T1000
When comparing GeForce GT 730M and Quadro T1000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 730M and Quadro T1000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro T1000
GeForce GT 730M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 730M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 730M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 730M | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 51% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 730M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 730M is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 730M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 670 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 730M.
- GeForce GT 730M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 730M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 1320% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 730M and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 222% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GT 730M and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 1375% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1200% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 453% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 2200% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2133% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 6−7 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 5−6 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2150% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than GeForce GT 730M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 730M | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
Code name | GK107 | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 January 2013 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.20 | |
Floating-point performance | 552.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 2000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |