GeForce GT 750M vs Quadro T1000
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 750M and Quadro T1000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 750M and Quadro T1000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro T1000
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | Quadro T1000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 50 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 428 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6000 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 414% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 313% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | Quadro T1000 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Code name | N14P-GT | TU117 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 | |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |