GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro T1000
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro T1000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro T1000.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro T1000
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 95 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Turing |
Code name | GF104 | TU117 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 288 | |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |