GeForce GTX 485M vs Quadro T1000
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 485M and Quadro T1000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 485M and Quadro T1000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro T1000
GeForce GTX 485M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 485M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 485M | Quadro T1000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 485M has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- GeForce GTX 485M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 485M is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 485M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 1011 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 485M | Quadro T1000 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Turing |
| Code name | N12E-GTX-A1 | TU117 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 January 2010 | 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Core clock speed | 384 | 1395 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |