GeForce GTX 560M vs Quadro T1000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 560M and Quadro T1000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 560M stacks up against Quadro T1000, check out specs charts below.
Quadro T1000
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 560M | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 560M has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 560M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 620 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 328% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 560M | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Turing |
Code name | N12E-GS | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2011 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
3D Gaming | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |