GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro T1000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro T1000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760A stacks up against Quadro T1000, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro T1000
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro T1000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 10% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 767 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 3992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 335% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro T1000 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Code name | GK106 | TU117 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |