GeForce GTX 850M vs Quadro T1000
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 850M and Quadro T1000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 850M will be the best choice, for others Quadro T1000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T1000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 850M | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 11% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 850M is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 850M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- GeForce GTX 850M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 850M | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
Code name | N15P-GT | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.08 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 153 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 1.8 Mh/s | |
Check Price |