GeForce MX150 vs Quadro T1000
When comparing GeForce MX150 and Quadro T1000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX150 and Quadro T1000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro T1000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX150 | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 73 MHz higher, than Quadro T1000.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 1992 MHz higher, than GeForce MX150.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 148% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 116% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce MX150. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX150 | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
Code name | N17S-G1 | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 16 May 2017 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |