GRID K140Q vs Quadro T1000
In this comparison between GRID K140Q and Quadro T1000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K140Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro T1000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K140Q
Quadro T1000
Main Specs
GRID K140Q | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K140Q has 160% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 545 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K140Q and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GRID K140Q and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 194% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 581% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4450% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K140Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K140Q | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
Code name | GK107 | TU117 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |