GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro T1000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Quadro T1000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M60 8Q stacks up against Quadro T1000, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 8Q
Quadro T1000
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID M60 8Q has 350% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 838 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 2988 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 8Q and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GRID M60 8Q and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 61% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 93% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GRID M60 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | GM204 | TU117 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |