HD Graphics 4400 vs Quadro T1000
In this comparison between HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro T1000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 4400 will be the best choice, for others Quadro T1000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T1000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
HD Graphics 4400 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 4400 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 4400 | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | System Shared | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 150% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 4400.
- HD Graphics 4400 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 4400 is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 4400 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 1195 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
- HD Graphics 4400 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 18−20 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 233% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 740% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 62% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 520% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than HD Graphics 4400. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics 4400 | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Turing |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |