Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro T1000
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro T1000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be the best choice, for others Quadro T1000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T1000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 1095 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 220% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 155% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 410% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 609% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake | Turing |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 10 July 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Quadro T1000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro M4000
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Quadro T1000 vs Quadro M4000
- Quadro T1000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti