Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro T1000
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro T1000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro T1000.
Quadro T1000
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro T1000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 1095 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 229% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 416% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 313% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro T1000 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Turing |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | TU117 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 January 2017 | 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 48 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 55.20 | |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |