Quadro 3000M vs Quadro T1000
When comparing Quadro 3000M and Quadro T1000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 3000M and Quadro T1000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro T1000
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 3000M has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 945 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 7375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 3000M and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro 3000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Turing |
Code name | Fermi | TU117 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 240 | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |