Quadro T1000 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro T1000 and Radeon HD 4850 X2, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro T1000 stacks up against Radeon HD 4850 X2, check out specs charts below.
Quadro T1000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 4850 X2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 770 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6010 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro T1000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 363% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale |
Code name | TU117 | R700 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 800 | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |