Quadro T1000 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
When choosing between Quadro T1000 and Radeon HD 4870 X2, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro T1000 and Radeon HD 4870 X2.
Quadro T1000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 4870 X2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 286 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 472% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 695 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 4400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 151% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 314% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale |
Code name | TU117 | R700 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 12 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 800 | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 700 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 28.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,120.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |