Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro 555X
In this comparison between Quadro T1000 and Radeon Pro 555X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T1000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T1000
Radeon Pro 555X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555X here:
Main Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 555X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 555X has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555X - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro 555X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 540 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 2920 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 113% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. |
Full Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 555X | |
Architecture | Turing | Polaris |
Code name | TU117 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.54 | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |