Quadro T1000 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When choosing between Quadro T1000 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro T1000 and Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Quadro T1000
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 42% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 2000 MHz higher, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 240% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Polaris |
| Code name | TU117 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 1219 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |