Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R7 A360
In this comparison between Quadro T1000 and Radeon R7 A360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T1000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T1000
Radeon R7 A360
Main Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 670 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 7997 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro T1000 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| Quadro T1000 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Meso |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.52 | |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | |