Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R9 M390X
In this comparison between Quadro T1000 and Radeon R9 M390X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T1000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M390X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T1000
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M390X has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390X - in Laptops.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M390X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 672 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M390X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro T1000 and Radeon R9 M390X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro T1000 and Radeon R9 M390X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3 |
| Code name | TU117 | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| Vulkan | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |