Quadro T1000 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

When comparing Quadro T1000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro T1000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro T1000

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro T1000	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type		DDR4
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	12−14
ultra / 1080p	21−24	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	1−2
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	30−33
medium / 1080p	40−45	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	55−60	21−24
ultra / 1080p	45−50	18−20
QHD / 1440p	35−40	1−2
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	45−50
medium / 1080p	60−65	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro T1000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	200−210
medium / 768p	220−230	170−180
ultra / 1080p	180−190	90−95
QHD / 1440p	110−120	50−55
4K / 2160p	70−75	24−27
high / 768p	210−220	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 55% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	35−40
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
Quadro T1000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	90−95
ultra / 1080p	100−110	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	45−50	16−18
ultra / 1080p	40−45	14−16
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	5−6
low / 720p	80−85	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	60−65	21−24
ultra / 1080p	45−50	18−20
QHD / 1440p	27−30	12−14
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	95−100
medium / 1080p	110−120	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 117% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	60−65	24−27
ultra / 1080p	45−50	18−20
QHD / 1440p	30−35	6−7
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	50−55
medium / 1080p	65−70	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	140−150	80−85
medium / 768p	120−130	70−75
high / 1080p	70−75	27−30
ultra / 1080p	30−35	10−12
QHD / 1440p	21−24	1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	20−22	6−7
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	27−30
medium / 1080p	30−35	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	120−130	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	16−18	7−8
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	27−30
medium / 1080p	35−40	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	130−140	50−55
medium / 768p	85−90	30−35
high / 1080p	45−50	16−18
ultra / 1080p	24−27	10−11
4K / 2160p	16−18	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 169% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	30−35
high / 768p	60−65	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.

Full Specs

	Quadro T1000	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	Turing	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	TU117	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019	15 August 2020
Pipelines		96
Core clock speed	1395 MHz
Boost Clock	1455 MHz
Transistor count	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	10 nm
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	DirectX 12_1
OpenGL	4.6
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

Quadro T1000 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares