Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro M6000 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q

    In this comparison between FirePro M6000 and Quadro T2000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro T2000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    FirePro M6000 Check Price
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Check Price

    FirePro M6000 and Quadro T2000 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: FirePro M6000 and Quadro T2000 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 or Quadro T2000 Max Q here:

    FirePro M6000 Laptops
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro M6000 Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 40 Watt
    Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • FirePro M6000 has 7% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
    • FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro T2000 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro T2000 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 180 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
    • FirePro M6000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 3500 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 8−9 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 5−6 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 20−22 60−65
    medium / 1080p 10−12 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 272% more, than FirePro M6000.

    Full Specs

      FirePro M6000 Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Architecture GCN Turing
    Code name Heathrow N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 July 2012 27 May 2019
    Pipelines 640 1024
    Core clock speed 750 MHz 930 / 1200 MHz
    Boost Clock 1500 / 1620 MHz
    Transistor count 1,500 million 4,700 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 12 nm
    Texture fill rate 32.00 103.7
    Floating-point performance 1,024 gflops
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 4500 MHz 8000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 5.1 6.5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 1.2.131
    CUDA 7.5
    Bus support n/a
    Laptop size medium sized medium sized
    Form factor MXM-B
    StereoOutput3D +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares