Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro W4190M vs Quadro T2000 Max Q

    In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and Quadro T2000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others Quadro T2000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    FirePro W4190M Check Price
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Check Price

    FirePro W4190M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: FirePro W4190M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M or Quadro T2000 Max Q here:

    FirePro W4190M Laptops
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro W4190M Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro T2000 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro T2000 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 105 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
    • FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 3−4 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 1−2 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 14−16 60−65
    medium / 1080p 5−6 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than FirePro W4190M.

    Full Specs

      FirePro W4190M Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Architecture GCN Turing
    Code name Mars XTX? N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 12 November 2015 27 May 2019
    Pipelines 384 1024
    Core clock speed 825 MHz 930 / 1200 MHz
    Boost Clock 900 MHz 1500 / 1620 MHz
    Transistor count 950 million 4,700 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 12 nm
    Texture fill rate 21.60 103.7
    Floating-point performance 691.2 gflops
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 8000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 64 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 5.1 6.5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 1.2.131
    CUDA 7.5
    Laptop size medium sized medium sized
    AppAcceleration +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares