Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    GRID K280Q vs Quadro T2000 Max Q

    In this comparison between GRID K280Q and Quadro T2000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro T2000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    GRID K280Q
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Check Price

    Quadro T2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro T2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 Max Q here:

    Quadro T2000 Max Q Laptops

    Main Specs

      GRID K280Q Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 40 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price
    • GRID K280Q has 462% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
    • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
    • GRID K280Q and Quadro T2000 Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
    • GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
    • GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 185 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
    • GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 12−14 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 7−8 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 1−2 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 24−27 60−65
    medium / 1080p 14−16 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GRID K280Q.

    Full Specs

      GRID K280Q Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Architecture Kepler Turing
    Code name GK104 N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 28 June 2013 27 May 2019
    Pipelines 1536 1024
    Core clock speed 745 MHz 930 / 1200 MHz
    Boost Clock 1500 / 1620 MHz
    Transistor count 3,540 million 4,700 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 12 nm
    Texture fill rate 95.36 103.7
    Floating-point performance 2,289 gflops
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 8000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 5.1 6.5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
    CUDA 3.0 7.5
    Laptop size medium sized
      Check Price

    Similar compares