GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Quadro T2000 Max Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M60 8Q stacks up against Quadro T2000 Max Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 8Q
Quadro T2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro T2000 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 40 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 462% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 373 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 2988 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 8Q and Quadro T2000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GRID M60 8Q and Quadro T2000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 61% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 93% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GRID M60 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro T2000 Max Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | GM204 | N19P-Q3 MAX-Q |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 930 / 1200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1500 / 1620 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 103.7 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | 7.5 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |