Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro T2000 Max Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 655 stacks up against Quadro T2000 Max Q, check out specs charts below.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro T2000 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro T2000 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 or Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Quadro T2000 Max Q
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
40 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro T2000 Max Q has 166% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro T2000 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 630 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
21−24
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
190−200
250−260
medium / 768p
160−170
220−230
ultra / 1080p
85−90
180−190
QHD / 1440p
45−50
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−33
70−75
high / 768p
120−130
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
85−90
110−120
ultra / 1080p
55−60
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
5−6
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
80−85
medium / 1080p
16−18
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
85−90
180−190
medium / 1080p
45−50
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 128% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
QHD / 1440p
7−8
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
75−80
140−150
medium / 768p
65−70
120−130
high / 1080p
24−27
70−75
ultra / 1080p
10−11
30−35
QHD / 1440p
1−2
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
8−9
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
100−110
130−140
ultra / 1080p
95−100
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
45−50
130−140
medium / 768p
27−30
85−90
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
9−10
24−27
4K / 2160p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
50−55
high / 768p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Quadro T2000 Max Q
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Turing
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2017
27 May 2019
Pipelines
48
1024
Core clock speed
300 MHz
930 / 1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1500 / 1620 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
103.7
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.4
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price