Quadro 3000M vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
In this comparison between Quadro 3000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 3000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro T2000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 3000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro 3000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M or Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M
Quadro T2000 Max Q
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
40 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M has 87% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro T2000 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro T2000 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 480 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 7375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
35−40
ultra / 1080p
1−2
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
4−5
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
16−18
100−110
medium / 1080p
6−7
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro 3000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
40−45
180−190
QHD / 1440p
21−24
110−120
4K / 2160p
16−18
70−75
high / 768p
65−70
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
110−120
ultra / 1080p
21−24
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
45−50
ultra / 1080p
2−3
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
10−12
80−85
medium / 1080p
4−5
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
60−65
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
50−55
180−190
medium / 1080p
10−12
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
3−4
30−35
4K / 2160p
2−3
24−27
low / 720p
18−20
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
4−5
70−75
ultra / 1080p
2−3
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
4−5
65−70
medium / 1080p
3−4
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
80−85
−
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
6−7
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
10−11
130−140
medium / 768p
8−9
85−90
high / 1080p
4−5
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
4K / 2160p
1−2
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
50−55
high / 768p
30−33
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro 3000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M
Quadro T2000 Max Q
Architecture
Fermi
Turing
Code name
Fermi
N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
22 February 2011
27 May 2019
Pipelines
240
1024
Core clock speed
450 MHz
930 / 1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 / 1620 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
18.00
103.7
Floating-point performance
432.0 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
625 MHz
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
2.1
7.5
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
