Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro K4000M vs Quadro T2000 Max Q

    In this comparison between Quadro K4000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K4000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro T2000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Quadro K4000M Check Price
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Check Price

    Quadro K4000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Quadro K4000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M or Quadro T2000 Max Q here:

    Quadro K4000M Laptops
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro K4000M Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 40 Watt
    Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro K4000M has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
    • Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro T2000 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro K4000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 330 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
    • Quadro K4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 5200 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 10−11 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 6−7 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 1−2 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 21−24 60−65
    medium / 1080p 12−14 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than Quadro K4000M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro K4000M Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Architecture Kepler Turing
    Code name N14E-Q3 N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 June 2012 27 May 2019
    Pipelines 960 1024
    Core clock speed 600 MHz 930 / 1200 MHz
    Boost Clock 1500 / 1620 MHz
    Transistor count 3,540 million 4,700 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 12 nm
    Texture fill rate 48.08 103.7
    Floating-point performance 1,154 gflops
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 2800 MHz 8000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 5.1 6.5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
    CUDA + 7.5
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 37 Mh/s
    Laptop size large medium sized
    Optimus +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares