Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro K4200 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q

    In this comparison between Quadro K4200 and Quadro T2000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K4200 will be the best choice, for others Quadro T2000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Quadro K4200 Check Price
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Check Price

    Quadro T2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro T2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 Max Q here:

    Quadro T2000 Max Q Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro K4200 Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 40 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro K4200 has 170% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
    • Quadro K4200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro T2000 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro K4200 and Quadro T2000 Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
    • Quadro K4200 is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
    • Quadro K4200 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 159 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
    • Quadro K4200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 2600 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 21−24 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 12−14 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 7−8 16−18
    4K / 2160p 5−6 10−11
    low / 720p 40−45 60−65
    medium / 1080p 27−30 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than Quadro K4200.

    Full Specs

      Quadro K4200 Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Architecture Kepler Turing
    Code name GK104 N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 22 July 2014 27 May 2019
    Pipelines 1344 1024
    Core clock speed 771 MHz 930 / 1200 MHz
    Boost Clock 784 MHz 1500 / 1620 MHz
    Transistor count 3,540 million 4,700 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 12 nm
    Texture fill rate 87.81 103.7
    Floating-point performance 2,107 gflops
    Length 241 mm
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 5400 MHz 8000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 172.8 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 5.1 6.5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
    CUDA 3.0 7.5
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 119 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares