Quadro M500M vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
When choosing between Quadro M500M and Quadro T2000 Max Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M500M and Quadro T2000 Max Q.
Quadro M500M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro M500M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M or Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
Quadro M500M
Quadro T2000 Max Q
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
40 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro T2000 Max Q has 33% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
Quadro M500M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro T2000 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro T2000 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro M500M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 99 MHz higher, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
Quadro M500M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 3996 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
3−4
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
5−6
55−60
ultra / 1080p
4−5
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
16−18
100−110
medium / 1080p
5−6
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
−
Quadro M500M and Quadro T2000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
250−260
medium / 768p
85−90
220−230
ultra / 1080p
40−45
180−190
QHD / 1440p
35−40
110−120
4K / 2160p
18−20
70−75
high / 768p
65−70
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
50−55
110−120
ultra / 1080p
24−27
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 130% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
1−2
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
10−12
80−85
medium / 1080p
3−4
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1080% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
9−10
60−65
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
1−2
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
50−55
180−190
medium / 1080p
12−14
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
6−7
60−65
ultra / 1080p
4−5
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
18−20
100−110
medium / 1080p
7−8
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
35−40
120−130
high / 1080p
6−7
70−75
ultra / 1080p
3−4
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
1−2
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
6−7
65−70
medium / 1080p
3−4
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
6−7
65−70
medium / 1080p
6−7
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 620% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
14−16
130−140
medium / 768p
10−11
85−90
high / 1080p
5−6
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
4K / 2160p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 812% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
50−55
high / 768p
30−33
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Quadro M500M.
Full Specs
Quadro M500M
Quadro T2000 Max Q
Architecture
Maxwell
Turing
Code name
GM108
N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 December 2015
27 May 2019
Pipelines
384
1024
Core clock speed
1029 MHz
930 / 1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1500 / 1620 MHz
Transistor count
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
17.98
103.7
Floating-point performance
863.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4004 MHz
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
6.5
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
5.0
7.5
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Optimus
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price