Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Radeon Pro 570
In this comparison between Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T2000 Max Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 570 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 570
Quadro T2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 Max Q | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 570 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro 570 - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro 570 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 70 MHz higher, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 570 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 1220 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 570.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 Max Q | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q3 MAX-Q | Polaris 20 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 930 / 1200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1500 / 1620 MHz | 1105 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.7 | 123.8 |
Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6780 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |