Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Radeon R9 M375X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon R9 M375X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon R9 M375X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M375X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 Max Q | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q and Radeon R9 M375X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 5 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M375X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 6875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. |
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 Max Q | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q3 MAX-Q | Tropo |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 930 / 1200 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1500 / 1620 MHz | 1015 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.7 | 40.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro T2000 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Radeon Pro 570
- Radeon R9 M375X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Radeon Pro 570
- Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Radeon HD 5850
- Quadro T2000 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Radeon HD 5850
- Radeon R9 M375X vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI