Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Quadro T2000 Max Q and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T2000 Max Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
Quadro T2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T2000 Max Q | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 495% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 356 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 5012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro T2000 Max Q and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro T2000 Max Q and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 89% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T2000 Max Q | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Code name | N19P-Q3 MAX-Q | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 930 / 1200 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1500 / 1620 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 2.0 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |