FirePro M5950 vs Quadro T2000 mobile
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M5950 and Quadro T2000 mobile, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M5950 stacks up against Quadro T2000 mobile, check out specs charts below.
FirePro M5950 and Quadro T2000 mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M5950 and Quadro T2000 mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 or Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950
Quadro T2000 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
60 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro T2000 mobile has 71% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro T2000 mobile uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro T2000 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Quadro T2000 mobile - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 850 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 7100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
35−40
ultra / 1080p
2−3
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
6−7
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
55−60
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
20−22
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
45−50
180−190
QHD / 1440p
27−30
110−120
4K / 2160p
18−20
70−75
high / 768p
70−75
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
FirePro M5950 and Quadro T2000 mobile have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
50−55
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−33
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
5−6
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
14−16
80−85
medium / 1080p
6−7
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
7−8
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
55−60
180−190
medium / 1080p
18−20
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 335% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
60−65
ultra / 1080p
8−9
45−50
QHD / 1440p
3−4
30−35
4K / 2160p
3−4
24−27
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
10−12
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
40−45
120−130
high / 1080p
8−9
70−75
ultra / 1080p
4−5
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 272% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
3−4
24−27
ultra / 1080p
1−2
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
9−10
65−70
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
ultra / 1080p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
9−10
65−70
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
20−22
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
7−8
45−50
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
4K / 2160p
2−3
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 55% more, than FirePro M5950.
Full Specs
FirePro M5950
Quadro T2000 mobile
Architecture
Terascale 2
Turing
Code name
Whistler-XT
N19P-Q3
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
13 April 2011
27 May 2019
Pipelines
480
1024
Core clock speed
725 MHz
1575 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
17.40
114.2
Floating-point performance
696.0 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57 GB/s
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
6.5
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
67 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Form factor
MXM-A
Check Price
Check Price