FirePro V4900 vs Quadro T2000 mobile
In this comparison between FirePro V4900 and Quadro T2000 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V4900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro T2000 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
Quadro T2000 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
60 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V4900 has 25% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro T2000 mobile uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro T2000 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 mobile - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro T2000 mobile - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 775 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
35−40
ultra / 1080p
1−2
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
4−5
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
16−18
100−110
medium / 1080p
6−7
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V4900 and Quadro T2000 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
250−260
medium / 768p
90−95
220−230
ultra / 1080p
40−45
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
65−70
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 192% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
50−55
110−120
ultra / 1080p
24−27
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 130% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
45−50
ultra / 1080p
2−3
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
1−2
14−16
low / 720p
12−14
80−85
medium / 1080p
4−5
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
60−65
ultra / 1080p
6−7
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
50−55
180−190
medium / 1080p
12−14
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 411% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
60−65
ultra / 1080p
6−7
45−50
QHD / 1440p
1−2
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
18−20
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 687% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
35−40
120−130
high / 1080p
6−7
70−75
ultra / 1080p
3−4
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
5−6
65−70
medium / 1080p
3−4
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
60−65
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
6−7
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
130−140
medium / 768p
10−11
85−90
high / 1080p
5−6
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
4K / 2160p
2−3
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 785% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
50−55
high / 768p
30−33
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 59% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
Quadro T2000 mobile
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Turing
Code name
Turks
N19P-Q3
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 November 2011
27 May 2019
Pipelines
480
1024
Core clock speed
800 MHz
1575 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
114.2
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
6.5
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price