FirePro W4190M vs Quadro T2000 mobile
When comparing FirePro W4190M and Quadro T2000 mobile, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4190M and Quadro T2000 mobile is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W4190M and Quadro T2000 mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W4190M and Quadro T2000 mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M or Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M
Quadro T2000 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro T2000 mobile uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro T2000 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro T2000 mobile - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 750 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
35−40
ultra / 1080p
1−2
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
7−8
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
18−20
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
45−50
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
70−75
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
27−30
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 112% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
3−4
45−50
ultra / 1080p
3−4
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
14−16
80−85
medium / 1080p
5−6
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
55−60
180−190
medium / 1080p
14−16
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 357% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
60−65
ultra / 1080p
6−7
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
20−22
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
8−9
70−75
ultra / 1080p
3−4
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
7−8
65−70
medium / 1080p
3−4
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro W4190M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
7−8
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
16−18
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
6−7
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
4K / 2160p
1−2
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 71% more, than FirePro W4190M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M
Quadro T2000 mobile
Architecture
GCN
Turing
Code name
Mars XTX?
N19P-Q3
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
12 November 2015
27 May 2019
Pipelines
384
1024
Core clock speed
825 MHz
1575 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1785 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
114.2
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price