FirePro W4300 vs Quadro T2000 mobile
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W4300 and Quadro T2000 mobile, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W4300 stacks up against Quadro T2000 mobile, check out specs charts below.
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4300
Quadro T2000 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
60 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro T2000 mobile has 20% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro W4300 and Quadro T2000 mobile have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 mobile - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro T2000 mobile - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 645 MHz higher, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4300.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
24−27
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
QHD / 1440p
7−8
35−40
4K / 2160p
5−6
18−20
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
200−210
250−260
medium / 768p
170−180
220−230
ultra / 1080p
95−100
180−190
QHD / 1440p
50−55
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−33
70−75
high / 768p
140−150
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
90−95
110−120
ultra / 1080p
60−65
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 27% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
24−27
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
95−100
180−190
medium / 1080p
50−55
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 107% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
24−27
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
QHD / 1440p
9−10
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
85−90
140−150
medium / 768p
75−80
120−130
high / 1080p
27−30
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
9−10
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
110−120
130−140
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 18% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
50−55
130−140
medium / 768p
30−35
85−90
high / 1080p
18−20
45−50
ultra / 1080p
10−12
24−27
4K / 2160p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
50−55
high / 768p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 4% more, than FirePro W4300.
Full Specs
FirePro W4300
Quadro T2000 mobile
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Turing
Code name
Bonaire
N19P-Q3
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 December 2015
27 May 2019
Pipelines
768
1024
Core clock speed
930 MHz
1575 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
Transistor count
2,080 million
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
44.64
114.2
Floating-point performance
1,428 gflops
Length
171 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.3
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
152 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
