GRID K220Q vs Quadro T2000 mobile
When choosing between GRID K220Q and Quadro T2000 mobile, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K220Q and Quadro T2000 mobile.
GRID K220Q
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
GRID K220Q | Quadro T2000 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 60 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 275% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 mobile - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T2000 mobile - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 830 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 3000 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K220Q and Quadro T2000 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GRID K220Q and Quadro T2000 mobile have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 526% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K220Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K220Q | Quadro T2000 mobile | |
Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
Code name | GK104 | N19P-Q3 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 2 July 2014 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 114.2 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 7.5 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |