NVS 810 vs Quadro T2000 mobile
In this comparison between NVS 810 and Quadro T2000 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 810 will be the best choice, for others Quadro T2000 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
NVS 810
Quadro T2000 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
60 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
8x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
NVS 810 has 13% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro T2000 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 mobile - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro T2000 mobile - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 673 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 6200 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
35−40
ultra / 1080p
1−2
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
4−5
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
16−18
100−110
medium / 1080p
6−7
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
NVS 810 and Quadro T2000 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
40−45
180−190
QHD / 1440p
21−24
110−120
4K / 2160p
16−18
70−75
high / 768p
65−70
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
110−120
ultra / 1080p
21−24
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 130% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
45−50
ultra / 1080p
2−3
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
10−12
80−85
medium / 1080p
4−5
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−11
60−65
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
50−55
180−190
medium / 1080p
10−12
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 443% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
5−6
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
3−4
30−35
4K / 2160p
2−3
24−27
low / 720p
18−20
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
4−5
70−75
ultra / 1080p
2−3
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
4−5
65−70
medium / 1080p
3−4
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
130−140
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
85−90
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 44% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
6−7
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
10−11
130−140
medium / 768p
8−9
85−90
high / 1080p
4−5
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
4K / 2160p
1−2
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 71% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
NVS 810
Quadro T2000 mobile
Architecture
Maxwell
Turing
Code name
GM107
N19P-Q3
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
4 November 2015
27 May 2019
Pipelines
512
1024
Core clock speed
902 MHz
1575 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1785 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
33.06
114.2
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
5.0
7.5
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price