Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro K5100M vs Quadro T2000 mobile

    In this comparison between Quadro K5100M and Quadro T2000 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K5100M will be the best choice, for others Quadro T2000 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Quadro K5100M Check Price
    Quadro T2000 mobile Check Price

    Quadro K5100M and Quadro T2000 mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Quadro K5100M and Quadro T2000 mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M or Quadro T2000 mobile here:

    Quadro K5100M Laptops
    Quadro T2000 mobile Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro K5100M Quadro T2000 mobile
    Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 60 Watt
    Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro K5100M has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
    • Quadro K5100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro T2000 mobile uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro K5100M has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • Quadro K5100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T2000 mobile - with Turing.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 804 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
    • Quadro K5100M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 4400 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 14−16 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 8−9 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 3−4 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 30−35 60−65
    medium / 1080p 18−20 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro K5100M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro K5100M Quadro T2000 mobile
    Architecture Kepler Turing
    Code name N15E-Q5-A2 N19P-Q3
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 23 July 2013 27 May 2019
    Pipelines 1536 1024
    Core clock speed 771 MHz 1575 MHz
    Boost Clock 1785 MHz
    Transistor count 3,540 million 4,700 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 12 nm
    Texture fill rate 98.69 114.2
    Floating-point performance 2,369 gflops
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 3600 MHz 8000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 115.2 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 5 6.5
    OpenGL 4.5 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
    CUDA + 7.5
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 35 Mh/s
    Laptop size large medium sized
    Optimus +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares