Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon E6760
In this comparison between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon E6760 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T2000 mobile will be the best choice, for others Radeon E6760 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E6760
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon E6760 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro T2000 mobile has 33% more power consumption, than Radeon E6760.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro T2000 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 975 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 4800 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon E6760 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 44% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon E6760 | |
| Architecture | Turing | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N19P-Q3 | Turks |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 2 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 52 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 380X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Radeon E6760 vs Radeon R9 380X
- Radeon E6760 vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Quadro FX 4800
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R7 M270DX
- Radeon E6760 vs Quadro FX 4800
- Radeon E6760 vs Radeon R7 M270DX