Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
When choosing between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 16, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 25% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 5600 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
24−27
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
QHD / 1440p
16−18
9−10
4K / 2160p
10−11
6−7
low / 720p
60−65
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
high / 1080p
55−60
35−40
ultra / 1080p
45−50
30−35
QHD / 1440p
35−40
18−20
4K / 2160p
18−20
10−11
low / 720p
100−110
75−80
medium / 1080p
60−65
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
240−250
medium / 768p
220−230
210−220
ultra / 1080p
180−190
130−140
QHD / 1440p
110−120
100−110
4K / 2160p
70−75
60−65
high / 768p
210−220
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
high / 1080p
45−50
30−33
ultra / 1080p
40−45
27−30
QHD / 1440p
27−30
21−24
4K / 2160p
14−16
9−10
low / 720p
80−85
60−65
medium / 1080p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
high / 1080p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
45−50
30−33
QHD / 1440p
27−30
18−20
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
high / 1080p
60−65
40−45
ultra / 1080p
45−50
30−35
QHD / 1440p
30−35
18−20
4K / 2160p
24−27
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
75−80
medium / 1080p
65−70
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 43% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
low / 768p
140−150
110−120
medium / 768p
120−130
100−110
high / 1080p
70−75
45−50
ultra / 1080p
30−35
20−22
QHD / 1440p
21−24
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
20−22
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
4−5
low / 720p
65−70
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−35
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−11
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
3−4
low / 720p
65−70
45−50
medium / 1080p
35−40
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
low / 768p
130−140
85−90
medium / 768p
85−90
55−60
high / 1080p
45−50
30−33
ultra / 1080p
24−27
16−18
4K / 2160p
16−18
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Turing
Vega
Code name
N19P-Q3
Vega Mobile
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
27 May 2019
15 November 2018
Pipelines
1024
1024
Core clock speed
1575 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1190 MHz
Transistor count
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
114.2
76.16
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
128.0 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.5
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Check Price
Check Price
