Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon Pro W5500M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon Pro W5500M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro T2000 mobile stacks up against Radeon Pro W5500M, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 41% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon Pro W5500M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 4000 MHz higher, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 107% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. |
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q3 | Navi 14 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 127.6 |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 380X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon R9 380X
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs GeForce GT 1030
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon RX 540
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GT 1030
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon RX 540