Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R7 370
In this comparison between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 370 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T2000 mobile will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 370 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile
Radeon R7 370
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
110 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 370 has 83% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 370 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 370 - in Desktops.
Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 370 - with GCN 1.0.
Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 7025 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 370.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
QHD / 1440p
16−18
8−9
4K / 2160p
10−11
5−6
low / 720p
60−65
40−45
medium / 1080p
40−45
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon R7 370.
high / 1080p
55−60
35−40
ultra / 1080p
45−50
30−35
QHD / 1440p
35−40
14−16
4K / 2160p
18−20
9−10
low / 720p
100−110
75−80
medium / 1080p
60−65
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 54% more, than Radeon R7 370.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
230−240
medium / 768p
220−230
210−220
ultra / 1080p
180−190
130−140
QHD / 1440p
110−120
100−110
4K / 2160p
70−75
55−60
high / 768p
210−220
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon R7 370.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
55−60
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 370 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 370.
high / 1080p
45−50
27−30
ultra / 1080p
40−45
24−27
QHD / 1440p
27−30
21−24
4K / 2160p
14−16
9−10
low / 720p
80−85
55−60
medium / 1080p
45−50
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than Radeon R7 370.
high / 1080p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
45−50
27−30
QHD / 1440p
27−30
16−18
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 45% more, than Radeon R7 370.
high / 1080p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
45−50
27−30
QHD / 1440p
30−35
16−18
4K / 2160p
24−27
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
75−80
medium / 1080p
65−70
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Radeon R7 370.
low / 768p
140−150
110−120
medium / 768p
120−130
100−105
high / 1080p
70−75
45−50
ultra / 1080p
30−35
18−20
QHD / 1440p
21−24
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Radeon R7 370.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
20−22
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
10−12
4K / 2160p
8−9
3−4
low / 720p
65−70
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−35
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Radeon R7 370.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R7 370.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Radeon R7 370.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−12
QHD / 1440p
10−11
3−4
4K / 2160p
7−8
2−3
low / 720p
65−70
40−45
medium / 1080p
35−40
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Radeon R7 370.
low / 768p
130−140
80−85
medium / 768p
85−90
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
16−18
4K / 2160p
16−18
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than Radeon R7 370.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon R7 370.
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile
Radeon R7 370
Architecture
Turing
GCN 1.0
Code name
N19P-Q3
Trinidad (Pitcairn)
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
27 May 2019
5 May 2015
Pipelines
1024
1024
Core clock speed
1575 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
975 MHz
Transistor count
4,700 million
2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
114.2
62.40
Floating-point performance
1,997 gflops
Length
152 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
975 MHz
Memory bandwidth
128.0 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.5
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
+
CUDA
7.5
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.42 kh/s
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
359 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Eyefinity
+
TrueAudio
+
Mantle
+
Design
reference
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
VCE
+
DDMA audio
+
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.52 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
14 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
150 Sol/s
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price
