Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 A375
When choosing between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 A375, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 A375.
Radeon R9 A375
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro T2000 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 675 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 7996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q3 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | no data |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 37.00 |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 380X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon R9 380X
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M