Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 M485X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 M485X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 M485X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 M485X are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 M485X are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile or Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile
Radeon R9 M485X
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
250 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
8 GB MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 M485X has 316% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
Quadro T2000 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M485X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Radeon R9 M485X has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M485X - in Laptops.
Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M485X - with GCN 3.
Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 852 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M485X.
Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M485X - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M485X.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
24−27
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
QHD / 1440p
16−18
10−11
4K / 2160p
10−11
6−7
low / 720p
60−65
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
high / 1080p
55−60
35−40
ultra / 1080p
45−50
30−35
QHD / 1440p
35−40
18−20
4K / 2160p
18−20
10−12
low / 720p
100−110
80−85
medium / 1080p
60−65
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 M485X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
240−250
medium / 768p
220−230
210−220
ultra / 1080p
180−190
140−150
QHD / 1440p
110−120
110−120
4K / 2160p
70−75
60−65
high / 768p
210−220
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 M485X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
high / 1080p
45−50
30−35
ultra / 1080p
40−45
27−30
QHD / 1440p
27−30
21−24
4K / 2160p
14−16
10−11
low / 720p
80−85
60−65
medium / 1080p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
high / 1080p
60−65
40−45
ultra / 1080p
45−50
30−35
QHD / 1440p
27−30
18−20
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
140−150
medium / 1080p
110−120
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
high / 1080p
60−65
40−45
ultra / 1080p
45−50
30−35
QHD / 1440p
30−35
18−20
4K / 2160p
24−27
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
80−85
medium / 1080p
65−70
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
low / 768p
140−150
110−120
medium / 768p
120−130
100−110
high / 1080p
70−75
50−55
ultra / 1080p
30−35
21−24
QHD / 1440p
21−24
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
20−22
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
4−5
low / 720p
65−70
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−35
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−11
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
3−4
low / 720p
65−70
45−50
medium / 1080p
35−40
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
low / 768p
130−140
90−95
medium / 768p
85−90
55−60
high / 1080p
45−50
30−35
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
4K / 2160p
16−18
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M485X.
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile
Radeon R9 M485X
Architecture
Turing
GCN 3
Code name
N19P-Q3
Amethyst
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
27 May 2019
14 May 2016
Pipelines
1024
2048
Core clock speed
1575 MHz
723 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
Transistor count
4,700 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
114.2
92.54
Floating-point performance
2,961 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
128.0 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.5
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Check Price
Check Price