Quadro T2000 mobile vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between Quadro T2000 mobile and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T2000 mobile will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 645 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 2988 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro T2000 mobile and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro T2000 mobile and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
Quadro T2000 mobile and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 7% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
Quadro T2000 mobile and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
Quadro T2000 mobile and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile. |
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q3 | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 5.2 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |